Translate

Τρίτη 10 Νοεμβρίου 2015

May 1941: Operation "Merkur", the destruction of the nazi fallschirmjäger in Crete

A stunned General: Student looks shocked as he speaks to the nazi parachutists who survived the invasion of Crete. Note their facial expressions, a Pyrrhic victory for Hitler's chosen ones. (postcard issued with the nazi propaganda magazine Der Adler)

General Student visited us almost immediately after the fall of Canea. Had fourteen days really elapsed since I had last seen him issuing orders in Athens?
He had visibly altered. He seemed much graver, more reserved, and older. There was no evidence in his features that he was joyful over the victory — his victory — and proud at the success of his daring scheme. The cost of victory had evidently proved too much for him. Some of the battalions had lost all their officers, and in several companies there were only a few men left alive.
. . . The battle for Crete was to prove the overture to the great tragedy which reached its climax at El Alamein and Stalingrad. For the first time there had stood against us a brave and relentless opponent on a battleground which favoured him.
On this occasion things had gone well with us, but it seemed almost a miracle that our great and hazardous enterprise had succeeded. How it did, I cannot say to this day. Success had suddenly come to us at a moment when, as so often happens in war, we had ceased to believe in the possibility of success.
My interview with General Student was brief and to the point. In answer to his questions I concisely reported our experiences in the attack and told him of our losses. When I had finished he grasped me firmly by the hand and held it for a long time. “I thank you,” was all he said; but the grasp of his hand and those three short words were quite sufficient for me.
- See more at: http://ww2today.com/28th-may-1941-the-germans-count-the-cost-of-crete#sthash.3s6pt6Aj.dpuf

The German invasion of Crete in May 1941 stands as a landmark in the history of airborne warfare. 

Up until that point, airborne operations had been used mainly in a tactical and operational context to seize key objectives in advance of the ground forces, such as the seizure during the Balkan campaign of the bridge over the Corinth Canal on the 26 April 1941, and the seizure of the Belgium fortress of Eban Emael on the 11 May 1940. 

The German invasion of Crete (codenamed Operation Merkur, or Mercury, after the Roman God of communication, travel and thievery – the counterpart of Hermes, the messenger of the Gods in Greek mythology) has been the only strategic airborne operation aimed at attacking and occupying such an important target. 

The operation was the brainchild of Generalmajor Kurt Student, the commander, and fanatical proponent of the airborne arm (the Fallschirmjäger) who believed that the paratroopers could operate in their own right and not merely be used to support the Wehrmacht

The Battle for Crete was a German victory but a costly one. 



Out of an assault force of just over 22,000 men, the Germans suffered some 5,500 casualties, of which 3,600 were killed or missing in action. 

Almost a third of the Ju52s used in the operation were damaged or destroyed. 

The Allies suffered almost 3,500 casualties (of which just over 1,700 were killed) and almost 12,000 were taken prisoner. 

The Royal Navy suffered 1 aircraft carrier, two battleships, six cruisers and seven destroyers badly damaged and another three cruisers and six destroyers sunk with the loss of over 2,000 men. The RAF lost some forty-seven aircraft in the battle. 

Exactly how many Greek soldiers and Cretan civilians died during the fighting will never be known. 



As a result of the huge losses suffered by the Fallschirmjäger in Crete, it was forbidden by Hitler to mount any large-scale operations in the future and apart from a few small-scale operations, mainly served as elite infantry for the rest of the war. 

The fact that the operation was undertaken just three weeks after the fall of Greece is a testament to the flexibility, ingenuity and determination of the Germans who had to overcome immense logistic difficulties. 



However, the German operation had been placed in serious risk from the start by hasty planning (Student should have landed the Fallschirmjäger farther away from the airfields, concentrated on one or two points and brought the convoys over during the day when the Luftwaffe could have covered them adequately), overconfidence, an overestimation of the local population’s sympathies with the invaders, inadequate intelligence and poor reconnaissance. 



The proper objective for the Fallschirmjäger was probably Malta, with Crete and Cyprus to follow, as Malta was the key to the central Mediterranean and to the narrow bottleneck that Allied east – west traffic and Axis north – south traffic had to pass to supply their respective forces in North Africa. Taking Malta could have resulted in Rommel and the Afrika Korps being in the Nile delta and on the banks of the Suez Canal. 

Finally, it delayed the start of Operation Barbarossa by some six weeks, although the exact impact of that cannot be quantified as a delay to the proposed 15 May start date would have been necessary anyway due to the late spring rains and thawing of the winter snow. 

British operations on Crete were hampered by the poor shape many units found themselves in after the campaign in Greece, indecision, misunderstanding, a lack of information (at least when the fighting started) and poor communications in the chain of command, both on Crete itself from Crete to Egypt. 




The order to Freyberg to preserve the airfields for the future use of the RAF (which they never did) proved to be an example. 

The importance of the Ultra intercepts was diluted by not revealing the exact source of the information to Freyberg who continued to focus on the threat of an amphibious attack. 



There was no clear-cut plan of defence, and what was undertaken was done so at the last minute. The defence of the island was improvised and with the British at full stretch in the rest of North Africa and the Middle East, the men and material necessary for the defence of Crete could not be spared. 



None of the commanders involved at the higher levels of command came away with laurels (with the exception of Cunningham who appreciated the impact of airpower on naval power and the strategic consequences for the Allies of a British defeat at Crete and the possibility of a shift in the naval balance of power in the Mediterranean) and showed too little aggressiveness, as their appreciation for the situation always lagged behind events, something that never hindered the Germans as their leaders led from the front. 



There was also considerable interference with Wavell’s command from London, specifically Churchill, that was recorded by Major General Sir John Kennedy, Chief of Operations for the General Staff, saying “I don’t see how we can win the war without Winston, but on the other hand, I don’t see how we can win it with him.” 


Baron von der Heydte, who had fought with the 3rd Parachute Regiment at Crete recalled his meeting with General Kurt Student, the German parachute commander, on 28th May 1941 in his book "Daedalus Returned: Crete 1941" 
Baron von der Heydte: Daedalus Returned: Crete 1941 - See more at: http://ww2today.com/28th-may-1941-the-germans-count-the-cost-of-crete#sthash.3s6pt6Aj.dpuf

General Student visited us almost immediately after the fall of Canea. Had fourteen days really elapsed since I had last seen him issuing orders in Athens?



He had visibly altered. He seemed much graver, more reserved, and older. There was no evidence in his features that he was joyful over the victory — his victory — and proud at the success of his daring scheme. The cost of victory had evidently proved too much for him. Some of the battalions had lost all their officers, and in several companies there were only a few men left alive.





. . . The battle for Crete was to prove the overture to the great tragedy which reached its climax at El Alamein and Stalingrad. For the first time there had stood against us a brave and relentless opponent on a battleground which favoured him.



On this occasion things had gone well with us, but it seemed almost a miracle that our great and hazardous enterprise had succeeded. How it did, I cannot say to this day. Success had suddenly come to us at a moment when, as so often happens in war, we had ceased to believe in the possibility of success.



My interview with General Student was brief and to the point. In answer to his questions I concisely reported our experiences in the attack and told him of our losses. 

When I had finished he grasped me firmly by the hand and held it for a long time. “I thank you,” was all he said; but the grasp of his hand and those three short words were quite sufficient for me.

Read more here, there and there


General Student visited us almost immediately after the fall of Canea. Had fourteen days really elapsed since I had last seen him issuing orders in Athens?
He had visibly altered. He seemed much graver, more reserved, and older. There was no evidence in his features that he was joyful over the victory — his victory — and proud at the success of his daring scheme. The cost of victory had evidently proved too much for him. Some of the battalions had lost all their officers, and in several companies there were only a few men left alive.
. . . The battle for Crete was to prove the overture to the great tragedy which reached its climax at El Alamein and Stalingrad. For the first time there had stood against us a brave and relentless opponent on a battleground which favoured him.
On this occasion things had gone well with us, but it seemed almost a miracle that our great and hazardous enterprise had succeeded. How it did, I cannot say to this day. Success had suddenly come to us at a moment when, as so often happens in war, we had ceased to believe in the possibility of success.
My interview with General Student was brief and to the point. In answer to his questions I concisely reported our experiences in the attack and told him of our losses. When I had finished he grasped me firmly by the hand and held it for a long time. “I thank you,” was all he said; but the grasp of his hand and those three short words were quite sufficient for me.
- See more at: http://ww2today.com/28th-may-1941-the-germans-count-the-cost-of-crete#sthash.3s6pt6Aj.dpuf
General Student visited us almost immediately after the fall of Canea. Had fourteen days really elapsed since I had last seen him issuing orders in Athens?
He had visibly altered. He seemed much graver, more reserved, and older. There was no evidence in his features that he was joyful over the victory — his victory — and proud at the success of his daring scheme. The cost of victory had evidently proved too much for him. Some of the battalions had lost all their officers, and in several companies there were only a few men left alive.
. . . The battle for Crete was to prove the overture to the great tragedy which reached its climax at El Alamein and Stalingrad. For the first time there had stood against us a brave and relentless opponent on a battleground which favoured him.
On this occasion things had gone well with us, but it seemed almost a miracle that our great and hazardous enterprise had succeeded. How it did, I cannot say to this day. Success had suddenly come to us at a moment when, as so often happens in war, we had ceased to believe in the possibility of success.
My interview with General Student was brief and to the point. In answer to his questions I concisely reported our experiences in the attack and told him of our losses. When I had finished he grasped me firmly by the hand and held it for a long time. “I thank you,” was all he said; but the grasp of his hand and those three short words were quite sufficient for me.
- See more at: http://ww2today.com/28th-may-1941-the-germans-count-the-cost-of-crete#sthash.3s6pt6Aj.dpuf
The back of the postcard issued with a copy of the nazi propaganda magazine Der Adler
General Student visited us almost immediately after the fall of Canea. Had fourteen days really elapsed since I had last seen him issuing orders in Athens?
He had visibly altered. He seemed much graver, more reserved, and older. There was no evidence in his features that he was joyful over the victory — his victory — and proud at the success of his daring scheme. The cost of victory had evidently proved too much for him. Some of the battalions had lost all their officers, and in several companies there were only a few men left alive.
. . . The battle for Crete was to prove the overture to the great tragedy which reached its climax at El Alamein and Stalingrad. For the first time there had stood against us a brave and relentless opponent on a battleground which favoured him.
On this occasion things had gone well with us, but it seemed almost a miracle that our great and hazardous enterprise had succeeded. How it did, I cannot say to this day. Success had suddenly come to us at a moment when, as so often happens in war, we had ceased to believe in the possibility of success.
My interview with General Student was brief and to the point. In answer to his questions I concisely reported our experiences in the attack and told him of our losses. When I had finished he grasped me firmly by the hand and held it for a long time. “I thank you,” was all he said; but the grasp of his hand and those three short words were quite sufficient for me.
- See more at: http://ww2today.com/28th-may-1941-the-germans-count-the-cost-of-crete#sthash.3s6pt6Aj.dpuf

Δευτέρα 9 Νοεμβρίου 2015

A rare Greek Bloch MB 151 in full colour, thanks to the efforts of Markos Danezis




According to research done by the blog A history of military equipment of Modern Greece (1821 - today), the Bloch MB.151 was the most modern fighter of the Greek Airforce in 1940; clearly superior to the Italian G.50s and at least equal to the MC.200s. 

However, out of the 25 ordered before the German invasion of France, only 9 were received and even fewer were operational in Oct. 1940. 

Due to lack of spares after the fall of France and the fact that they were initially reserved for the defence of Athens, the MB.151s did not see as much action as they should. 

The Italians and Germans seemed unaware of their existence in Greece, and would always report them as British Hurricanes and Spitfires, although these were not operating there at the time. 

While not massively inferior to any contemporary fighter, the fact that its engine was optimised for the relatively low altitude of 3km, placed it at a disadvantage, especially against German BF109Es. It's also worth pointing out that all 9 MB.151s were delivered with second-hand engines that were not in good shape and would easily overheat.


The photo most probably shows the D 174 (Δ 174) which was strafed by Messerschmitts at Amfikleia airfield, 19 Apr. 1941.




Greek artist Markos Danezis recoloured the rare photograph of the strafed and destroyed MB 151, despite the fact that the quality of the original photo did not make it an easy task. 

Frozen in Time Part 2! A newly found WW2 bunker reveals its secrets


The story of a WW2 bunker unearthed in the town of Hanstholm in Denmark a couple of weeks ago was a dream come true for many WW2 enthusiasts worldwide.

Frozen in Time! Unearthing a WW2 bunker, 70 years after the end of the war

It is one of the few WW2 nazi bunkers found pretty much intact, with lots of artifacts dating back to the infamous nazi rule.



The Regelbau 506 model bunker was part of the "Atlantic Wall" paranoid German dictator Hitler ordered to construct, which featured some 7,000 bunkers, ranging from Norway to France, with the objective of repelling an Allied invasion in Europe.



The hidden bunker was buried beneath four metres of soil and remained untouched since the early 50s, for 65 years, and  volunteers from the historical society of Thy and Vester Hanherred, in cooperation with curators from the Museum of Hanstholm decided for a short while to bring it to light.

 
The researchers and WW2 enthusiasts were not expecting to find any articles, since the bunker was cleared before it was sealed, many items were reused and the metal pieces were melted down.

 

Among the artifacts retrieved were ammunition boxes and other metal parts, including a tripod, for a machine gun and another bolted down mount for artillery.

 
Currently, the local authorities are examining their options, with some arguing that the bunker should be buried again, while others believe it should be preserved for future generations.



In the area of Hanstholm, many WW2 bunkers exist, some of which were found on the beach some time ago, due to a storm that removed the sand dunes that covered them.

Παρασκευή 6 Νοεμβρίου 2015

Help needed! The story and face behind an Afrika Korps belt






A DAK (Deutsche Afrika Korps) belt in excellent condition, considering its age and use, is a riddle for WW2 enthusiasts.

To whom did it belong? 

Was it war booty, removed from a killed soldier, or just an item an allied soldier took from a prisoner of war, as a reminder of his days fighting for freedom against the nazi regime?

According to the markings, some DAK historians managed to identify the markings as Field Post Number 43734 - (1.10.1940-27.2.1941) 4. kleine Kraftwagen - Kolonne
Panzer - Divisions - Kolonne19 (8.9.1942 - 11.3.1943) gestrichen (8.9.1943-22.4.1944) 14.12.1943 Stab u. 1.-4. Kompanie Feldersatz-Bataillon Feldherrnhalle.


Now the big question: To whom this belt was issued to? Anyone with information and guidance is welcome to assist in the identification!